Attorney Allain Marain

Entrapment Law and Strategy

Entrapment: Introduction

Entrapment Under Federal Law Entrapment involves commission of a crime with active participation by a law enforcement official, or by someone acting at the direction of a law enforcement official. The law enforcement official (or agent) induces the person to commit an offense. This inducing may occur in either of two ways. In the first way, the law enforcement official (or agent) assures the person that the activity in question is, in fact, legal. In the second way, the law enforcement official (or agent) persuades the person to commit the offense. For an entrapment defense based upon this second way to succeed, the person is required to prove that, absent the persuasion, he would not have committed the offense. Entrapment is a legal defense to both federal and New Jersey criminal charges.

Entrapment Under Federal Law

Under federal law, the entrapment defense arises from the “common law.” That is, no federal statute establishes the federal entrapment defense. Rather, the federal entrapment defense comes from decisions made by federal judges in federal courts. The United States Supreme Court decision that recognized the entrapment defense as a matter of federal law came over eighty years ago. It was Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 53 S.Ct. 210, 77 L.Ed. 413 (1932).

Entrapment Under New Jersey Law

New Jersey now defines the entrapment defense by statute. The specific New Jersey entrapment statute is N.J.S. 2C:2-12. Well before enactment of N.J.S. 2C:2-12, however, New Jersey court decisions recognized the entrapment defense through its own common law. An early case recognizing the entrapment defense was State v. Dolce, 41 N.J. 422 (1963). This Dolce opinion, in turn, relied heavily on the federal Sorrells case.

Entrapment: Strategic Considerations

In order to defend on the theory that law enforcement committed an entrapment, it is necessary to concede that the person actually committed the illegal act in the first place. Sometimes, the prosecution's proofs in that regard will be weak. In those situations, the person must decide whether to rely upon his presumption of innocence as to whether he committed the act; or whether to concede that he committed the act, but rely upon the entrapment defense.

Law Offices of Allan Marain

Allan Marain and Norman Epting, Jr. are criminal entrapment lawyers in New Jersey. They have over seventy years of combined criminal defense experience. They have successfully defended thousands of persons charged with crimes. They are available to discuss your charges in a one-on-one confidential no-obligation conference.

Call them.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
Mr. Marain I just wanted to take the opportunity to thank you again. I don't have enough words to express my feelings, I am just extremely thankful that I had you as an attorney. I wish you and your family the best. J.L.
★★★★★
Mr. Marain, you were fantastic in handling my case. Thank you for being so thorough and keeping me informed in every step of the process. I will definitely come to you again if I need any legal assistance in the future. C.R.
★★★★★
Mr. Marain got right to work on my case. And didn't stop until it was taken care of. A very nice man and a professional. I am happy I got hooked up with him. T.S.C.
★★★★★
Mr. Marain is an excellent attorney. He represented me very well. I had an excellent attorney on my side. I would recommend Mr. Marain without any reservations. F.M.M.
★★★★★
I would strongly recommend Mr. Marain. His follow-ups that explained the progress and status of the case were very helpful and informative. It was a pleasure using your services. S.P.H.