New Jersey Drug-Induced Deaths: Introduction


New Jersey calls deaths that occur as a result of illicit drug distribution “drug-induced deaths”. N.J.S. 2C:35-9 is the New Jersey statute that deals with drug-induced deaths. N.J.S. 2C:35-9 makes those who contribute to drug-induced deaths by manufacturing, distributing, or dispensing drugs “strictly liable” for those deaths. Essentially, the Strict Liability for Drug-Induced Deaths, which arose from New Jersey’s own “War on Drugs”, creates a new type of homicide.

If a victim dies because of the injection, inhalation, or ingestion of a “controlled dangerous substance” (CDS), the person who furnished that substance can be held responsible for that death. This is true even if they had no reason to suspect that their actions could result in a death. N.J.S. 2C:35-9 still considers them legally accountable.

The specific drugs that invoke this statute are those found in “Schedules I, II, and III” of New Jersey’s drug classification. Schedules are lists of drugs classified by severity. Included in these named schedules are drugs such as heroin, LSD, methamphetamine, PCP, and fentanyl. (Bizarrely, New Jersey still places marijuana into Schedule I, this despite the fact that, in all recorded human history, the number of people who have died as a result of marijuana overdose is zero.)

Drug-Induced Deaths in New Jersey: The Connection


New Jersey holds the manufacturer, distributor, or dispenser criminally responsible when each of two factors are present:

1. That without the injection, inhalation, or injection of the substance, the victim would not have died; and

2. That the death was not too remote or too dependent on the actions of another person to still be considered a direct result of the drug or drugs.

Although a “strict-liability” crime, the situation of persons charged with a drug-induced death is far from hopeless. Various defenses are available for exploration despite the strict-liability label. These possible defenses include:
  • It was someone else who was responsible for distributing, manufacturing, or dispensing the drugs in question;
     
  • The drugs the defendant allegedly distributed were not the cause of the victim’s death;
     
  • The relationship between the distribution, manufacture, or dispensing of the drug and the victim’s death was too remote; and
     
  • New Jersey courts lack jurisdiction over the situation.

The remoteness defense is actually specified in N.J.S. 2C:35-9. “Remoteness” refers to the situation where an incident takes place that is too far removed in time or events to be considered a sufficient result of another action. By way of analogy, a person can start a small fire with the intention of burning garbage. If this fire spreads and ends up killing someone, it is not considered the fire-starter’s fault so long as unforeseen factors or events allowed the fire to spread.

Broken fire alarms and smoke detectors, non-fire-retardant carpets, and breezes coming in from open windows can all contribute to the fire’s spread. The law would treat these factors as the ultimate cause of a person’s death, not the fire-starter, because of the “remoteness” of the death from the fire-starter. In the context of drug-induced deaths, “remoteness” is the idea that a death is too distant from the providing of the drug to still be considered a direct result of the manufacture, distribution, or dispensing.

The rules for liability in terms of remoteness differ in a major way from the standards for other kinds of homicide. With drug-induced deaths, the willing actions of the victim to ingest, inhale, or inject a substance have no bearing on “remoteness”. Specifically, a victim's intervening action in ingesting a drug does not absolve the distributor.

The actions of another must be wholly unrelated to the ingestion, inhalation, or injection of a drug to remove strict liability for the victim's death. The mere fact that another person injects or aids the victim in taking the drug does not mean the victim's death was not a direct result of the drug. Although another person is involved, that involvement does not negate the causal relationship between the providing of the drug and the death of the victim.

Drug-induced deaths are not limited to overdosing. If a person is killed by another means, but would not have been killed without the ingestion of the drug, the drug is still seen as the instigator for the death. For example, if a drug renders someone immobile in a dangerous situation, such as on a highway or on train tracks, and that person dies as a result, the drug is considered a non-remote cause of death, and the distributor can be prosecuted.

Drug-Induced Deaths in New Jersey: “Distribution”


“Distribution”, as defined by the New Jersey, involves the actual, attempted, or heavily inferred delivery of drugs. All involved in a chain of distribution are considered liable under N.J.S. 2C:35-9. Thus if Person A delivers the drug to Person B who, in turn, delivers it to Person C, and so on, down to Person G, Person A could still be held liable for the death of Person G if the drug that Person A first distributed later causes Person G's death. However, the State has the burden of proving the chain of passage from the defendant to the victim, beyond a reasonable doubt, however long that chain may be. The longer the chain, the more difficult it will be for the State to establish that proof. Note that when possession of the drug or drugs is shared, distribution within the meaning of the drug-induced death statute is deemed not to have happened. Thus, in the case of joint-possession of a CDS, neither possessor is liable for the other's death.

Profit is not required for “distribution”. Drugs given as gifts to friends or partners are still considered as having been “distributed” by one person to another.

A person is liable for a drug-induced death even if they did not know their conduct would result in death. The distribution itself, however, must be done knowingly and purposely. In other words, there must be intentional distributing of the drug from one person to another.

Drug-Induced Deaths: New Jersey's Jurisdiction


It sometimes happens that death results from drug-distribution activities that began in New Jersey, but concluded elsewhere. Situations of that nature raise the issue of “jurisdiction.”A case that illustrates New Jersey’s current interpretation of strict-liability jurisdiction for drug-induced deaths is State v. Ferguson.

In Ferguson, defendant Byrd sold heroin to defendants Ferguson and Potts, in New Jersey. Those two buyers then went to New York where, in turn, they sold the New Jersey heroin to Cabral. Cabral overdosed in New York and died. New Jersey charged Byrd, Ferguson, and Potts with violating the strict-liability for drug-induced deaths statute.

The trial court found that the two who distributed the heroin in New York could not be prosecuted under New Jersey’s strict-liability law, as neither the distribution to the victim nor the death itself occurred in New Jersey. But the trial court sustained a guilty finding as to Byrd, since his distribution did occur in New Jersey.

Under some circumstances, the fact that a person's conduct in New Jersey was part of a drug-distribution chain ending in a death would be sufficient to confer territrorial jurisdiction upon New Jersey courts. Since the heroin sold in New Jersey resulted in another's death, New Jersey could constitutionally enable New Jersey to claim jurisdiction. In Ferguson, however, the death occurred in New York, a state where there is no strict-liability for drug-induced deaths statute.

To understand the significance of that fact, it is necessary to consider New Jersey's territorial jurisdiction statute. That statute is N.J.S. 2C:1-3(a)(1). What 2C:1-3(a)(1) says is that New Jersey can exercise territorial jurisdiction when either the defendant's conduct or the result of that conduct occurs in New Jersey and is an element of a criminal offense. Since Byrd's sale caused a result in a place where that result was not a crime.

Under New Jersey law, if the result of a crime occurs in a state where the instigating conduct is not criminal, New Jersey does not have the jurisdiction to prosecute that crime. As a result, New Jersey's only remaining claim to jurisdiction lay in legislative intent. If the state could prove that the legislation that created the strict-liability for drug-induced death statute was written with the intention of applying to deaths outside of New Jersey, New Jersey would have the necessary jurisdiction.

Although the legislation passed under the “War on Drugs” is often overbroad and far-reaching, the courts in Ferguson did not interpret the intent behind the original legislation to ease typical jurisdiction rules. Without expanding existing territorial jurisdictional requirements, the state could not successfully prosecute the New Jersey defendant. The Ferguson decision is reported at 455 N.J. Super. 56 (App.Div., 2018).

Drug-Induced Deaths: Grading and Penalties


New Jersey classifies strict-liability for drug-induced deaths as a first degree crime. The normal range of imprisonment upon conviction for a first-degree crime is ten to twenty years. Under the No Early Release Act, a defendant convicted of this crime must serve at least eighty-five percent of that time before becoming eligible for release on parole.

Drug-Induced Deaths in New Jersey: The Law Offices of Allan Marain


Strict-Liability for Drug-Induced Deaths statutes are found in almost no other state. Its penalties are of a severity reserved for the most serious crimes. The lawyers at the Law Offices of Allan Marain have the legal experience and skills necessary to defend individuals charged with drug offenses. They are available to review your drug-induced death matter.


***************

 Overview  |  Allan Marain  |  Norman Epting, Jr.  |  The Practice  |  Selecting a Lawyer 
 Trial Transcript  |  Jobs and Internships 

 Abandoned Cars  |  Aiding Suicide  |  Appeals  |  Arson  |  Assault  |  Bad Checks  |  Bribery  |  Burglary 
 CDS in Vehicle  |  Cell Phones  |  Child Pornography  |  Cocaine  |  Computer Crimes 
 Conditional Dismissal  |  Conspiracy  |  Credit Card Fraud  |  Drug Crimes  |  Drug Deaths  |  DWI/DUI 
 Eluding  |  Endangering  |  Entrapment  |  Evidence  |  Expungements  |  False Swearing 
 Federal Appeals  |  Federal Crimes  |  Fictitious Reports  |  Forgery  |  Graves Act  |  Gun Law  |  Harassment 
 Hazing  |  Homicide  |  Identity Theft  |  Insurance Fraud  |  Invasion of Privacy  |  Jury Service  |  Juvenile Delinquency 
 Kidnapping  |  Leaving the Scene  |  Lewdness  |  Mail Fraud  |  Manslaughter  |  Marijuana  |  Megan's Law 
 Miranda Warnings  |  Money Laundering  |  Municipal Court  |  Murder  |  NERA  |  No Insurance  |  Official Misconduct 
 PCR  |  Peeping Tom  |  Perjury  |  Point Assessments  |  Police Misconduct  |  Possession  |  Prostitution 
 PT I  |  Receiving Stolen P'ty  |  Red Light Cameras  |  Refusals  |  Resisting Arrest  |  Revoked List  |  Robbery 
 Sexual Assault  |  Shoplifting  |  Stalking  |  Street Crimes  |  Tax Crimes--Federal  |  Tax Crimes--NJ 
 Terroristic Threats  |  Theft  |  Theft by Deception  |  Theft of Services  |  Traffic Offenses 
 Unauth'd Prac Law  |  Underage Drinking  |  Underage Gambling  |  Urinating in Public 
 Vehicular Homicide  |  Violation of Probation  |  Weapons Possession  |  White Collar Crimes  |  Wire Fraud 

 Discrimination  |  Domestic Violence  |  Drivers Licenses  |  Excessive Force  |  Freedom of Speech 
 Personal Injury  |  Whistleblowers 

 Case Review  |  Super Links  |  First and Goal  |  Directions  |  Parking  |  PGP Public Key 

 The Bottom Line 

Law Offices of Allan Marain
Attorneys and Counsellors at LawFirm accepts PayPal for fees relating to New Jersey Lawyers for criminal charges, DWI DUI in State and federal court in New Jersey
100 Bayard Street
P.O. Box 1030
New Brunswick NJ 08903
Phone 732-828-2020
or Toll Free: 877-652-6531
email: Info@MarainLaw.com

“We, as criminal defense lawyers, are forced to deal with some of the lowest people on earth. People who have no sense of right and wrong. People who will lie in court to get what they want. People who do not care who gets hurt in the process. It is our job, our sworn duty as criminal defense lawyers, to protect our clients from those people.”

Cynthia Roseberry

 
Counsellors at Law in the Law Offices of Allan Marain, located in New Brunswick, represent clients throughout Central and Northern New Jersey. That includes Asbury Park, Bedminster, Belleville, Bergenfield, Berkeley Heights, Bernards Township, Bernardsville, Bogota, Bound Brook, Branchburg, Brick, Bridgewater, Clifton, Clinton, Closter, Cranbury, Cranford, Cresskill, Deal, Demarest, Denville, Dover, Dumont, Dunellen, East Brunswick, East Rutherford, East Windsor, Edison, Elizabeth, Emerson, Englewood, Englishtown, Ewing, Franklin Township, Freehold, Garfield, Garwood, Hackensack, Highland Park, Hillsborough, Hillsdale, Hillside, Jersey City, Kearny, Kenilworth, Lakewood, Lawrence Township, Mahwah, Manville, Marlboro, Matawan, Metuchen, Middlesex Borough, Monroe, Mountainside, New Brunswick, North Brunswick, Nutley, Old Bridge, Paramus, Parsippany, Paterson, Perth Amboy, Piscataway, Plainfield, Plainsboro, Point Pleasant, Princeton, Rahway, Raritan, Readington, Red Bank, Ridgefield, Ridgefield Park, Ridgewood, Robbinsville, Rockaway, Rocky Hill, Roselle, Roselle Park, Rutherford, Sayreville, Scotch Plains, Seabright, Seaside Heights, Seaside Park, Secaucus, Shrewsbury, Somerville, South Amboy, South Bound Brook, South Brunswick, South Orange, South Plainfield, South River, Sparta, Spotswood, Summit, Teaneck, Tenafly, Toms River, Trenton, Union, Wall, Warren, Washington, Watchung, West Windsor, Westfield, Woodbridge, and other communities in Bergen County, Mercer County, Middlesex County, Monmouth County, Ocean County, Somerset County, Sussex County, Union County, and Warren County. They handle criminal matters in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. They are available to handle matters in the United States Supreme Court.

Criminal Lawyers in New Jersey and MarainLaw.com
© Copyright 2006-2019, Allan Marain, New Brunswick, NJ, All rights reserved.
For information, questions, or suggestions about our site, please email our webmaster.
Web site design by DNEBA Enterprises » Accessible and Effective Web Design.
Search engine optimization by Rank Magic.
Page last updated 18 August 2019, and displayed Sunday 17 November 2019, at 04:44:05 EST.
Hosted by Westhost »When you expect more from your Web host.
NJ Criminal Defense Lawyer Provides Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional code   Criminal Lawyer in NJ adheres to CSS standards   Site powered by Apache for users with problems relating to NJ New Jersey marijuana pot paraphernalia arrest arrested municipal court lawyer Rutgers police   Dynamic Drive provides much-valued technical assistance for attorneys at law in New Jersey court defense